February 7, 2025
Deron Brunson filed his Petition for Writ of Quo Warranto in the Utah Supreme Court to remove Governor Spencer Cox, and Lt. Governor Deidre Henderson from office. His writ provides documented proof that they did not get the necessary signatures needed to qualify or the 2024 election ballot (Download)

February 7, 2025 12:49 PM
The Utah Supreme Court sent a letter to Deron acknowledged receipt of his Petition for a Writ of Quo Warranto. (Download)

February 18, 2025
Deron Brunson filed a motion for "Expedited Review". Without this the court could sit on the case and not make a decision. The Utah Supreme Court sent an email to Governor Spencer J. Cox & Assistant Solicitor General for Utah, Erin T. Middleton with a copy of Deron's Motion for Expedited Review, and was given until Feb. 21 to respond. (Download)

February 21, 2025
The Cox team responded with their opposition and factually contradicted the evidence of the quo warranto by falsely alleging that Brunson did not move expeditiously in order that Brunson's motion for expedited review be granted. (Download)

February 22, 2025
Deron responded with his reply to their opposition clearly pointing out that Cox/Henderson did not object to the facts of the quo warranto, thereby admitting the facts of the case as a matter of law, and that their opposition wrongfully disregarded the facts of the case when they falsely alleged that Deron did not act expeditiously when he filed his motion for expedited review. (Download)

February 25, 2025
The court entered on the docket "calendared for law and motion" What does it mean to be "Calendared for law and motion"? According to google: "Calendered for law and motion" means that a legal case, specifically a motion filed by one of the parties, has been scheduled to be heard by the court during a designated "law and motion" calendar, which is a specific court session dedicated to hearing pre-trial motions and arguments on legal issues rather than full trials; essentially, it means the court has set a date and time to hear the motion. It appears that the Supreme Court had decided to hear live arguments on Deron's motion for a expedited review. (See Docket Report)

March 5, 2025
The Court denied Deron's Quo Warranto.(See the Court Order)

March 7, 2025
Deron filed a "Rule 35 Petition for Rehearing" declaring that Court's denial of his quo warranto violated the object principle of justice.(See the Court Order)

Send the court your letter! They need to hear from you! NOW!!
(We have one prepared for you)
Click Here

As of March 7th letters have been sent!